Tonight during dinner I received an interesting phone call. It was one of those robocalls that come during political campaigns. The recorded voice on the other end of the phone introduced herself as somebody Prejean--"you probably know me best as the woman who courageously spoke out in defense of marriage at the recent Miss America pageant."
Well, truth be told, I didn't know her best as anything, but I hung up as I realized 1) it was a recorded political call, and 2) I had no interest in listening to some goof ball tell me why my traditional marriage was somehow threatened by the possibility of gay marriage. Because, basically, I believe that's a load of horseshit. Energetically hanging up the phone led to an interesting conversation at the dinner table about why I hung up. And, happily, my daughters also found the idea that gay marriage somehow threatens traditional marriage, completely absurd. We had a fascinating conversation about being straight and being gay and who we know that is straight and who we know that is gay and who we know that might not open-minded about the whole issue. . . but I digress.
So after dinner I decided to do a little bit of research to find out what had happened, and what this Miss Prejean had actually said--because I did find it surprising that a Miss America contestant would choose the biggest pageant of her life to publicly air her political views. And the story I read is almost as absurd as Ms. Prejean's position.
If you, like me, totally missed the hubub, here's a summary. Celebrity (??) blogger Perez Hilton was a judge at the Miss America Pageant (WHY?), and he ASKED HER--as her pageant question--what she thought of gay marriage. So she answered the question. Based on her background and upbringing, she believed that marriage should be between a man and woman, and gay marriage is wrong. And Perez Hilton gets all bent out of shape and goes on the Today show and God knows where else, and says how completely inappropriate it was for her to ANSWER HIS QUESTION. What kind of bullshit is that?
So, here's the thing. I TOTALLY disagree with her. I reiterate, I DO NOT share her opinion. Not at all. BUT, what the hell was she supposed to do? Lie? Sure it might have been more diplomatic, but it wouldn't have been true. Hilton could have reacted publicly by saying he was sorry she felt that way, that he disagreed with her, whatever, whatever, whatever. But NO, he's up in arms because she answered his question and he didn't like it.
What a loser.
Anyway, now that I know a little bit more about what happened, I kind of want to know why her recorded voice was calling me. We've got local elections coming up this weekend, but they don't have anything to do with gay marriage. Heck, they barely have anything to do with party affiliations. What could the money behind that robocall possibly have wanted from me? If any of you get the call, try not to hang up until you figure out what they're calling for. I'm interested.. .